Forum latest

  • It's true..
    A wide latitude is a given to faithful posters at thise olde housee. Not like subtitl...
  • It's true..
    I had completely forgen this thread. Are we to contemplate that our bad behavior (off...
  • It's true..
    This is one heavy movie. If you're in the mood for some gravitas cubed, here it is: ...
Is Linux Irrelevant?
Linux
Written by Daniel   
Monday, 10 August 2009 11:17

It's not the distro or even the Linux kernel that matter. It's the things made with Linux -- the servers, smartphones, netbooks, and other mobile devices.

By Serdar Yegulalp
InformationWeek
August 10, 2009 04:00 AM

As the story goes, in the late eighties Bill Gates was asked about the competition Unix posed to Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT). He smiled and asked, "Which Unix?"

The same could be said of Linux today. Which Linux? Linux is now defined mostly by the fact that it isn't any one single thing -- no one distribution, software house, or entity has the last word on what Linux is going to be. To that end, the only "Linux" worth calling out by that name alone is the Linux kernel itself -- a kernel which is continually repackaged and distributed in a slew of different ways.   [Comments...]
 
Don't Click Here Don't Click Here Either