Forum latest

Game Addiction - Serious Business!
Written by Raphael2040   
Thursday, 14 June 2007 14:29

The AMA [American Medical Association] have began putting forward plans to recognise 'internet and video gaming addiction' as a formal diagnostic disorder.

According to them, gaming for more than two hours a day is one of many symptoms of addiction. If it is an addiction, what's next? Health support? Psychologists? Anti-gaming pills?

How about bigger warning labels? 

If this is the case, perhaps we should set up a Gamers Anonymous in the UK. It could prove to be quite successful. Anyone care to join?

According to them, many of us here, including you reading this, could be classified as 'junkies'.

But seriously. Gaming never hurt anybody...

 Did it..?


The report, titled 'Report Of The Council On Science And Public Health: Emotional and Behavioral Effects, Including Addictive Potential, of Video Games", defined a gamer as the following;


 "A gamer is a term used to describe a person who plays games. Historically, a gamer was someone who played role-playing games or war games, but more recently the term has come to include computer and video game players. Although the term technically includes those who do not necessarily consider themselves gamers (ie, casual gamers), it is a commonly used colloquial term to identify persons who spend as much of their leisure time as possible playing or reading about games. Video gaming has traditionally been a social experience, and most video games are playable by more than one person. Multi-player video games can be played either competitively or cooperatively online by using multiple input devices, or by “hotseating."


The proposed report concludes with the following calls to action;

1. That our American Medical Association (AMA) urge agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission as well as national parent and public interest organizations such as the Entertainment Software Rating Board, and parent-teacher organizations to review the current ratings system for accuracy and appropriateness relative to content, and establish an improved ratings systems based on a combined effort from the entertainment industry and peer review. (Directive to Take Action)

2. That our AMA work with key stakeholder organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians to (a) educate physicians on the public health risks of media exposure and how to assess media usage in their pediatric populations; and (b) provide families with educational materials on the appropriate use of video games. (Directive to Take Action)

3. That our AMA, in accordance with the position of the American Academy of Pediatrics, support the recommendation of 1 to 2 hours of total daily screen time, and that the total time allotted to playing video games should be included in that 1 to 2 hour allotment. (Directive to Take Action)

That our AMA support increased awareness of the need for parents to monitor and restrict use of video games and the Internet and encourage increased vigilance in monitoring the content of games purchased and played for children 17 years old and younger. (New HOD Policy)

5. That our AMA encourage expanded research by organizations such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health to fund research on the long-term beneficial and detrimental effects not only of video games, but use of the Internet by children under 18 years of age. (Directive to Take Action)

6. That our AMA strongly encourage the consideration and inclusion of "Internet/video game addiction" as a formal diagnostic disorder in the upcoming revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV. (Directive to Take Action)


 If, indeed, it does become classified as a disorder, it's only fair to assume that lawyers will use it to their advantage in the court, as video games to be an influence on murder. In that case, what else can be recognised as a disorder and an addiction? If this proposal goes through, then one can only imagine the hell that is going to be unleashed upon our geeky little souls.  The good news is, however, that it is only the American Medical Association that has proposed this idea. As it stands, the British Medical Association is yet to put forward a similar report. But, given past experiences, our best bet is that Britain is going to follow suit and want to class it as a disorder too.


Disorder is such a harsh word. It's a label, and it's going to make us feel bad about ourselves. Don't you think? Let us know in the forums! 


See also

None found.

Hardware | Windows | Linux | Security | Mobile Devices | Gaming
Tech Business | Editorial | General News | folding@home

Forum | Download Files

Copyright ©2001 - 2012, AOA Forums.  All rights reserved.

Alliance of Overclocking Arts

Links monetized by VigLink

Don't Click Here Don't Click Here Either